Re: plural properties should become singular

On 2/5/14 5:36 AM, Ruben Verborgh wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>>> For my projects, i've often use OWL Restrictions to impose cardinality and range constraints, but with my web-developer hat on, this is really difficult to understand, so having an alternative notation would be useful, as long as we can give it some formal semantics which may tie it back to OWL.
>> Gregg,
>>
>> We should use OWL where relations appropriate.
> Just to let you know that I'm willing to add in the OWL stuff.
> I have some experience with that, especially with regard to reasoning.
> (That is: I know well what impact each addition has on possible derived knowledge.)
>
> Do we turn this into an issue?
>
> Ruben
>

Yes, if that works re., the standaard protocol for setting the framework 
for this emerging vocabulary.

-- 

Regards,

Kingsley Idehen	
Founder & CEO
OpenLink Software
Company Web: http://www.openlinksw.com
Personal Weblog: http://www.openlinksw.com/blog/~kidehen
Twitter Profile: https://twitter.com/kidehen
Google+ Profile: https://plus.google.com/+KingsleyIdehen/about
LinkedIn Profile: http://www.linkedin.com/in/kidehen