- From: Ruben Verborgh <ruben.verborgh@ugent.be>
- Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 10:36:59 +0000
- To: Kingsley Idehen <kidehen@openlinksw.com>
- Cc: public-hydra@w3.org
Hi all, >> For my projects, i've often use OWL Restrictions to impose cardinality and range constraints, but with my web-developer hat on, this is really difficult to understand, so having an alternative notation would be useful, as long as we can give it some formal semantics which may tie it back to OWL. > > Gregg, > > We should use OWL where relations appropriate. Just to let you know that I'm willing to add in the OWL stuff. I have some experience with that, especially with regard to reasoning. (That is: I know well what impact each addition has on possible derived knowledge.) Do we turn this into an issue? Ruben
Received on Wednesday, 5 February 2014 10:37:31 UTC