- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2014 22:42:28 -0400
- To: Brian Kardell <bkardell@gmail.com>
- CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
[trimming cc list] On 09/27/2014 10:19 PM, Brian Kardell wrote: > > > I don't fully see the value of asking a question of the form "if the > WebApps Working Group were to do something that they appear to be > unwilling or unable to do, would you approve of it?" > > > Am I doing that? As I said, looking at the thread it seems like there is > considerably agreement. Am I missing it? Who in the WG is unwilling or > unable/why - can you clarify? The best short version remains PLH's statement: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-admin/2014Sep/0035.html I can assure you that if a document like the one you describe were to be made to exist that it would be included as an option for the Director to consider. Longer version: this mailing list (public-html) is for the HTML WG. This is the current charter for the HTML WG: http://www.w3.org/2007/03/HTML-WG-charter Note that "URL" is not in that charter. Here is the WebApps charter: http://www.w3.org/2014/06/webapps-charter.html Note that "URL" is in that charter. Here is the latest URL draft published by WebApps: http://www.w3.org/TR/url/ Note the date on that document (2012). Here is a statement of intent to publish a new document on 16 September 2014: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/0492.html Here is the mailing list for WebApps: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-webapps/2014JulSep/ - Sam Ruby
Received on Sunday, 28 September 2014 02:42:57 UTC