W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Validity constraints on <section>

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:58:38 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+Vn7Y=+D13pfc22PNJwm1NhqCfntxQpRz_NxRupE3zeW=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com>
Cc: public-html@w3.org
hi bruce

>I once asked this (or something like it). I was told we shouldn't, as a
site might Ajax in a heading and some text.

the possible addition of content via scripting could be a reason for
allowing a number of currently non conforming markup patterns

is there any concrete examples where this may be an issue?

with regards

--
SteveF
HTML 5.1 <http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/>
<http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html>


On 21 March 2013 10:32, Bruce Lawson <brucel@opera.com> wrote:

> On Thu, 21 Mar 2013 10:02:24 -0000, Robin Berjon <robin@w3.org> wrote:
>
>  I've therefore been wondering: would it make sense to make section
>> invalid if it does not have heading content as its direct children? Put
>> differently, what are the use cases for a headless section?
>>
>
> I once asked this (or something like it). I was told we shouldn't, as a
> site might Ajax in a heading and some text.
>
>
> --
>
>
> Bruce Lawson
> Open standards evangelist
> Developer Relations Team
> Opera
>
> http://dev.opera.com
>
>
Received on Thursday, 21 March 2013 10:59:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 21 March 2013 10:59:49 GMT