W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2013

Re: Proposed extension to HTML5.1 for rollup captions

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 20:22:18 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2kQNaYFmjm0VKumGW6y888D5hF7nUqStKw8kVq28LCG9w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 8:18 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote:

>
> On Mar 5, 2013, at 3:37 PM, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com> wrote:
>
>  > These seem to be settling nicely, so once the editor transition is
> over, indeed an FSA is indicated.****
>
> Then I suggest we wait for the Final Specification Agreement to be done
> BEFORE we take up this discussion in the HTML WG.  That is how I believe
> the CG to WG transition process is supposed to work.****
>
>
> The proposal Silvia is making is not part of the WebVTT specification or
> contained in any Text Tracks Community Group spec. It's just a proposal for
> a change to the HTML TextTrack API, that would work with a separate
> proposed WebVTT feature. So I don't think there is any need to gate
> Silvia's HTML proposal on an FSA for WebVTT.
>

Thanks - that's exactly what I meant.

I think the confusion originates in that my "extension spec" is written as
an appendix to a WebVTT extension spec. I will extract it into a different
doc to clarify.

Silvia.
Received on Wednesday, 6 March 2013 09:23:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 6 March 2013 09:23:05 GMT