W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2013

Re: Technical Review of EME (DRM in HTML5)

From: Glenn Adams <glenn@skynav.com>
Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2013 21:12:20 -0700
Message-ID: <CACQ=j+fFbC=8X55uk619-=+0PsEzbCHM0yKOoEwW1AWokxaLuw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
Cc: David Dorwin <ddorwin@google.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>wrote:

> Let me be crystal clear. I would be delighted if this specification
> figured out how to create an open and inter-operable DRM ecosystem that
> was simple to implement, that was fair to content creators and viewers
> alike, and that would work across all browsers on all platforms. Really,
> I would.

You appear to misunderstand the scope/goals of the EME spec. Defining "an
open and inter-operable DRM ecosystem" is not in scope. The EME abstract
[1] makes this clear, so it is clear that you start your comments based on
a false assumption.

The issue of content key protection is also clearly marked out of scope
[2], so your comments on protection of key secrets are similarly based on a
false assumption.

I'd suggest you carefully reread the abstract and other statements in EME
that clearly delineate the scope of this spec, and reformulate your
comments accordingly.


Received on Sunday, 27 January 2013 04:13:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:30 UTC