W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2013

Re: Week 4/5: Staged WHATWG patches for HTML5.1 / HTML5.0 CR

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2013 08:05:55 +0000
Message-ID: <CA+ri+V=1tjSLEvwxbQomX88WhSqt3epTohc+q6VveZShHEbiKw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, public-html <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Silvia,

I do not think this section should be included, as it states that there is
not a dedicated element for marking up the main part of the content of a
page.This contradicts the definition of main in HTML 5.1 [1]

"The main<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/grouping-content.html#the-main-element>
 element represents<http://www.w3.org/html/wg/drafts/html/master/rendering.html#represents>
 the main content section of the
a document"

I think that it would be useful to some advice on how to mark up the main
content of sections and articles. I think that this would be better placed
in the main element section of the spec.

 So if its OK I will write a patch for it and the group can review the
whatwg patch and my patch before either are added to the spec.



On 3 February 2013 06:31, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 10:47 AM, Leif Halvard Silli <
> xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:
>> Silvia Pfeiffer, Fri, 1 Feb 2013 19:05:00 +1100:
>> > This week the following WHATWG patches up to and inc commit 7679 [1]
>> have
>> > been cherry-picked into the W3C HTML specification (master branch) for
>> > HTML5.1. This takes us to WHATWG patches up to 30th January 2012, i.e.
>> we
>> > are up-to-date.
>> Under 'Common idioms without dedicated elements', the WHATWG spec
>> includes a section on "The main part of the content" which describes
>> various ways to mark up - or not mark up - the main part of the content.
>> http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/multipage/common-idioms.html#the-main-part-of-the-content
>> Is that section destined to be included?
> It's in the next patch 7680, which I will look at next week:
> https://github.com/w3c/html/commit/67934d61a46c1a2d8f1203ed0084f19f63a18af0
> Are you advocating its inclusion?
> Thanks,
> Silvia.
Received on Sunday, 3 February 2013 08:07:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:31 UTC