W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2012

Re: Clarification of "Extensibility" section (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Sep 2012 10:24:34 -0400
Message-ID: <505B2722.2000404@intertwingly.net>
To: Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>
On 09/20/2012 10:15 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>
> I have more general concern. I think it would be useful to have some
> general rules covering this earlier then later. For example some people
> are upset by what the plan is proposing for longdesc. If they will make
> all efforts to create separate extension spec and there will not be
> clear rules when this gets into validator they might end up in very
> unfair situation.

On that topic we did have the foresight to check with Mike, and got 
prior agreement that long description support would be added once such a 
document attains FPWD status.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 14:27:29 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 20 September 2012 14:27:29 GMT