Re: Clarification of "Extensibility" section (Was: Re: Getting HTML5 to Recommendation in 2014)

On 09/20/2012 10:15 AM, Jirka Kosek wrote:
>
> I have more general concern. I think it would be useful to have some
> general rules covering this earlier then later. For example some people
> are upset by what the plan is proposing for longdesc. If they will make
> all efforts to create separate extension spec and there will not be
> clear rules when this gets into validator they might end up in very
> unfair situation.

On that topic we did have the foresight to check with Mike, and got 
prior agreement that long description support would be added once such a 
document attains FPWD status.

- Sam Ruby

Received on Thursday, 20 September 2012 14:27:29 UTC