W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > November 2012

Re: Formal Objections on REC-track status of polyglot and alt-techniques

From: Lachlan Hunt <lachlan.hunt@lachy.id.au>
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2012 18:31:30 +0100
Message-ID: <50B79BF2.6070906@lachy.id.au>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, public-html WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 2012-11-29 18:15, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> At the time we discussed Note track vs REC at TPAC, I did not
> mention anything about withdrawing Formal Objections, temporarily or otherwise.
> I simply did not think about it.
> 
> After thinking about it and discussing, I've concluded that it would
> be better to have a Working Group Decision

OK, I have no problem with this.

However, please run the poll with independent questions about:

a) Whether the documents should or should not contain any normative
statements.
b) Whether the document should be on the REC-track or NOTE-track.

> [*] To pre-emptively address potential worries: if WG decides to
> proceed with these documents on the REC track, this approach will still
> result in your Formal Objections being forwarded to the Director to
> consider as part of the CR transition and will not prejudice them in any
> way.

In that case, since the presence of a formal objection does not preclude
the WG from conducting a poll on the issue, it seems my formal objection
can simply remain conditional on the document's REC-track status.

-- 
Lachlan Hunt
http://lachy.id.au/
http://www.opera.com/
Received on Thursday, 29 November 2012 17:31:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:35 UTC