- From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- Date: Sun, 25 Nov 2012 20:40:29 -0500
- To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 11/25/2012 04:34 PM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 11/25/2012 11:38 AM, Manu Sporny wrote: >> >> Note that this is not a W3C formal objection at this point. This >> is an objection to publish Microdata along the Recommendation >> track. This objection will become an official W3C formal objection >> if the HTML Working Group continues down the path to Recommendation >> with Microdata. The formal objection will not be filed if a >> decision is made to publish the Microdata specification as a W3C >> Note. > > If you would like the WG to make a formal decision as to whether this > particular document is to be pursued on the Recommendation Track or > Note Track, I would encourage you to follow the following process: > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy-v3.html#note-vs-rec I request that the WG make a formal decision on this. I have filed a bug: https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=20082 Assuming that the editor responds in the way that I expect him to respond (no change necessary), I request that the bug is escalated to a Tracker Issue. -- manu -- Manu Sporny (skype: msporny, twitter: manusporny) Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. blog: The Problem with RDF and Nuclear Power http://manu.sporny.org/2012/nuclear-rdf/
Received on Monday, 26 November 2012 01:41:00 UTC