W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2012 10:36:01 +1100
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2n6SkhxL9KauY47oXdX4fNmjwkwo_2JwE9m4r5FbiLppg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, "'"'xn--mlform-iua@målform.no' <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, rubys@intertwingly.net, laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com, mjs@apple.com, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, public-html-a11y@w3.org, public-html@w3.org
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote:
> Silvia Pfeiffer writes:
>
> What about annotating the Requirements document we prepared with
> pointers to the technology that implements them?
>
> Would that be a useful way for people to understand what aspects of HTML
> 5 media provide support for which specific alternative media renderings?
> Is this a useful way to extend the value of that document? You'll recall
> PF has put the Requirements doc on a W3C Note track. Would this kind of
> annotation help? Or just confuse?

You're referring to this one, I assume:
http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/media-accessibility-reqs/

I don't mind that. I could do it - it'd be simple.

BTW: I've always wanted to ask: how did you decide who to make the
editor of that document?

Regards,
Silvia.
Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 23:36:57 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:47 GMT