On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 9:44 AM, Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net> wrote: > Silvia Pfeiffer writes: > > What about annotating the Requirements document we prepared with > pointers to the technology that implements them? > > Would that be a useful way for people to understand what aspects of HTML > 5 media provide support for which specific alternative media renderings? > Is this a useful way to extend the value of that document? You'll recall > PF has put the Requirements doc on a W3C Note track. Would this kind of > annotation help? Or just confuse? You're referring to this one, I assume: http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/media-accessibility-reqs/ I don't mind that. I could do it - it'd be simple. BTW: I've always wanted to ask: how did you decide who to make the editor of that document? Regards, Silvia.Received on Thursday, 22 March 2012 23:36:57 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:47 GMT