W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: CP, ISSUE-30: Link longdesc to role of img [Was: hypothetical question on longdesc]

From: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 13:32:39 -0700
Message-ID: <4F6A3AE7.6000108@jumis.com>
To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
CC: David Singer <singer@apple.com>, Sean Hayes <Sean.Hayes@microsoft.com>, John Foliot <john@foliot.ca>, "janina@rednote.net" <janina@rednote.net>, "'xn--mlform-iua@målform.no'" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, "rubys@intertwingly.net" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com" <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>, "mjs@apple.com" <mjs@apple.com>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 3/21/2012 1:24 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer wrote:
>> >  Or we simply say the obvious "If the image is not a representative frame of the video, or conveys information in addition to the content of the video, then a description of that information must also be included with the description(s) of the video that are supplied for accessibility (e.g. alt, longdesc, transcript, etc.)."
> I agree with this sentence - in particular if it solves the deadlock.
> However, we don't currently have alt, longdesc or transcript
> attributes defined for video. We could say "... (e.g. aria
> attributes)." and then clarify this part of the sentence as we add
> other accessibility attributes to<video>.

Are we in a deadlock?

My understanding is that I30 is locked on some ARIA issues, and the 
general push to get rid of @longdesc.
This thread/tangent is more of an exploration as to where @longdesc may 
also be extended (if it's not gotten rid of).
Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 20:33:02 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:31 UTC