On Mar 21, 2012, at 13:24 , Silvia Pfeiffer wrote: >> >> Or we simply say the obvious "If the image is not a representative frame of the video, or conveys information in addition to the content of the video, then a description of that information must also be included with the description(s) of the video that are supplied for accessibility (e.g. alt, longdesc, transcript, etc.)." > > I agree with this sentence - in particular if it solves the deadlock. > However, we don't currently have alt, longdesc or transcript > attributes defined for video. We could say "... (e.g. aria > attributes)." and then clarify this part of the sentence as we add > other accessibility attributes to <video>. Thanks. (It is tragic we have spent so much time arguing about this detail, when we don't have the major case(s) covered - accessible non-timed alternatives to the media itself.) David Singer Multimedia and Software Standards, Apple Inc.Received on Wednesday, 21 March 2012 20:32:56 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:47 GMT