W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2012

Re: Revert Request for "http+aes" scheme (see also ISSUE-179)

From: Laura Carlson <laura.lee.carlson@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 Mar 2012 06:44:16 -0600
Message-ID: <CAOavpvdGy6kLQr2-S-62_mEqujk3XLxGmqWkC84tCN7aWK21uw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Hi all,

I second this request.

Best Regards,
Laura

On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> I believe that the addition of the "http+aes" URI scheme
> (<http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/spec/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.5601;r2=1.5602>
> plus subsequent edits) is controversial in that:
>
> - there's a related issue (ISSUE-179) which hasn't been decided yet,
>
> and
>
> - addition of a new URI scheme seems to be a major change that shouldn't
> happen after Last Call without broad consensus.
>
> See also related thread starting with
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0795.html>.
>
> Best regards, Julian
>



-- 
Laura L. Carlson
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2012 12:44:48 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:30 UTC