On Tue, 06 Mar 2012 06:11:01 -0000, Christian Kaiser <kaiserc@google.com> wrote: > For the record, YouTube is interested in ClearKey. It's obviously subject > to negotiations and business decisions that are yet to happen, but > ClearKey may provide enough robustness for *some* use cases. > YouTube is also interested in other "shades of gray" between ClearKey and > commercial CDMs in terms of maximum robustness, so that more use cases > can be covered. It would be interesting to explore how robust an open > source, > royalty-free CDM can be. > > It seems like a good idea to create a "playground" that enables these > kinds of explorations. The proposal at hand does that. I hope we'll see > it in > action one day. That is good news! In terms of clearkey, is http+aes scheme a satisfactory solution? By the "shades of gray" solutions, do you mean other uses of ClearKey (such as combining it with JS-based key obfuscation) or non-clearkey CDMs? -- regards, Kornel LesińskiReceived on Tuesday, 6 March 2012 10:02:17 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:46 GMT