Note that the URI mailing list <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/uri/> is probably more appropriate than the HTTP list for this. Regards, On 14/06/2012, at 12:29 PM, Carsten Bormann wrote: > On Jun 14, 2012, at 01:45, Kornel Lesiński wrote: > >> enc:<parameters>,<absoluteURI> > > Yep, that nicely generalizes the "frob" idea I proposed in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2012JanMar/0833.html (except that it focuses in on encryption). > > Given that the IETF is closing in on the ni: scheme for the hash-based part, would it be worthwhile thinking about aligning yours with that? http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-farrell-decade-ni > > Grüße, Carsten > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:45:04 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 14 June 2012 02:45:08 GMT