W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2012

Re: ISSUE-30: longdesc "LongdescZeroEdit" - outlook

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:34:38 -0400
Message-ID: <5017ECFE.9040204@intertwingly.net>
To: Janina Sajka <janina@rednote.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
CC: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On 07/30/2012 02:54 PM, Janina Sajka wrote:
> Sam:
>
> The HTML-A11Y Task Force Text Subteam will consider whether to update
> its position at its teleconference Tuesday. I expect that there will be
> a desire to do so regardless of which Issue 204 is adopted and that this
> will require several weeks. I'll provide an update following the call
> Tuesday.

As we would like to proceed to survey, the co-chairs request that all 
proposal updates be completed by August 17th.

> Janina

- Sam Ruby

> Sam Ruby writes:
>> Two corrections below (copy/paste errors).  Sorry for the confusion.
>> Kudos to mjs for spotting them.
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>> On 07/27/2012 11:36 AM, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> At this point issue 204 has gone to survey, seeking objections on two
>>> proposals.
>>>
>>>    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/AllowAriaReferHidden
>>>    http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4
>>>
>>> In order to help the chairs plan our next steps, I would appreciate some
>>> indication as to whether or not people will be requesting an opportunity
>>> to update their proposals based on the decision, and if so, an estimate
>>> as to how long that would take.
>>>
>>> So regarding the "LongdescZeroEdit" proposal[1]...
>>>
>>> 1) Should the "AllowAriaReferHidden" proposal be selected, would the
>>> InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if so, how long do you
>>> estimate that it would take?
>>
>> Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ...
>>
>>> 2) Should the "Correct_Hidden_Attribute_Section_v4" proposal be
>>> selected, would the InstateLongdesc proposal need to be updated, and if
>>
>> Correction: ... would the LongdescZeroEdit proposal ...
>>
>>> so, how long do you estimate that it would take?
>>>
>>> I want to emphasize that this query is solely for planning purposes and
>>> will not affect the outcome of issue 204.
>>>
>>> The survey on issue 204 closes on Friday August 3rd.  A response by that
>>> time would be greatly appreciated.
>>>
>>> - Sam Ruby
>>>
>>> [1] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/LongdescZeroEdit
>>>
>>> -------- Original Message --------
>>> Subject:     ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections
>>> Resent-Date:     Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:19:07 +0000
>>> Resent-From:     public-html@w3.org
>>> Date:     Fri, 27 Jul 2012 14:18:04 +0000
>>> From:     Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
>>> To:     public-html@w3.org <public-html@w3.org>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ISSUE-204: aria-hidden - Straw Poll for Objections
>>>
>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/204
>>>
>>> The HTML WG has not reached consensus on how to exempt ARIA attributes
>> >from the rule that prohibits reference to hidden elements.
>>>
>>> The poll is available here and it will run through Fri Aug 3:
>>>
>>> https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issue-204-objection-poll/
>>>
>>> Please read the introductory text before entering your response.
>>>
>>> In particular, keep in mind that you don't *have* to reply. You only
>>> need to do so if you feel your objection to one of the options is truly
>>> strong, and has not been adequately addressed by a clearly marked
>>> objection contained within a Change Proposal or by someone else's
>>> objection. The Chairs will be looking at strength of objections, and
>>> will not be counting votes.
>>>
>>> /paulc
>>>
>>> HTML WG co-chair
>>>
>>> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
>>>
>>> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
>>>
>>> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:35:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:33 UTC