W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2012

CfC: Close ISSUE-206: meta-generator by Amicable Resolution

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 10:26:04 -0400
Message-ID: <5017EAFC.5040800@intertwingly.net>
To: "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
CC: Edward O'Connor <eoconnor@apple.com>
No Alternate or Counter proposals were received.  Therefore, we continue 
to have only one active Change Proposal:


At the current time, the chairs are issuing a call for consensus on this 
  proposal.  If anybody would like to raise an objection during
this time, we will require them to accompany their objection with a
concrete and complete change proposal.

If no objections are raised to this call by August 8, 2012, we will
direct the editor to make the proposed change, and will only consider
subsequently reopening this issue based on new information and a
complete change proposal based on the spec's contents as it exists after 
this change is applied.

Note: we are aware (per below) that Ted is working on a counter 
proposal.  The intent of this CfC is to make a hard deadline for such.

- Sam Ruby

On 07/24/2012 01:57 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
> Hi,
> Maciej wrote:
>> The Chairs have granted a reopen request for a portion of ISSUE-31,
>> resulting in new ISSUE-206, on the basis of the following Change
>> Proposal
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/Issue31cMetaGeneratorUpdated
>> At this time the Chairs would also like to solicit additional Change
>> Proposals (possibly with "zero edits" as the Proposal Details), in
>> case anyone would like to advocate the status quo or a different
>> change than the specific one in the existing Change Proposals.
>> If no counter-proposals or alternate proposals are received by [July
>> 27th, 2012], we proceed to evaluate the change proposals that we have
>> received to date.
> The proposal on the table removes the existing feature without providing
> a replacement for it. I volunteer to produce a counter proposal which
> will provide a suitable replacement, and I'll do so by end of day Friday
> (the 27th).
> Thanks,
> Ted
Received on Tuesday, 31 July 2012 14:26:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:25 UTC