W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2012

RE: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix- Straw Poll for Objections

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2012 16:14:37 +0000
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, "Philippe Le Hegaret (plh@w3.org)" <plh@w3.org>, "Michael(tm) Smith (mike@w3.org)" <mike@w3.org>
Message-ID: <AB5704B0EEC35B4691114DC04366B37FBF180C@TK5EX14MBXC289.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
The Chairs and Team feel that the discussion in the IETF is open-ended is not likely to close soon.  Therefore we are going to go forward with this survey and will take up any input later.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de] 
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 3:26 PM
To: Paul Cotton
Cc: public-html@w3.org
Subject: Re: ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix- Straw Poll for Objections

On 2012-07-10 21:11, Paul Cotton wrote:
> ISSUE-189: uri-web-prefix - Straw Poll for Objections
>
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/189
>
> The HTML WG has not reached consensus on whether HTML5 should assign a 
> special meaning to the prefix "web+".
>
> The poll is available here and it will run through Thu Jul 19:
> ...

This topic was discussed last week in the IETF/W3C liaison call, and my understanding was that there was agreement that this needs further discussion. As such, I would think that the HTML WG should wait for the outcome of this, so that at least the CPs can be updated accordingly.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 12 July 2012 16:15:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:33 UTC