W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > July 2012

Re: ISSUE-194

From: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jul 2012 09:09:22 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHp8n2nUTNiRbfrJsJWNkAL_kaO-2daZHNcSnPsCieLVDHL=jA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Cc: "Edward O'Connor" <eoconnor@apple.com>, public-html@w3.org, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 9:04 PM, Silvia Pfeiffer
<silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> You are correct in that both proposals are much more similar now.
> We did indeed try to find a compromise solution in the last meeting,
> but agreed to disagree at this stage.
>
> I've still got a TODO to improve the TranscriptURL proposal with some
> language that compares it to the IDREFs proposal with
> advantages/disadvantages. I, however, have to attend to my wedding
> party tomorrow, so will not get to it before next week (and even then
> will take some time out from our honeymoon).  You can expect something
> before the end of the week.

The CP has been updated at
http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposal/ISSUE-194/TranscriptURL
.

Best Regards,
Silvia.
Received on Monday, 9 July 2012 07:10:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 9 July 2012 07:10:12 GMT