- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 08:00:38 -0400
- To: Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
- CC: Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, "public-html-a11y@w3.org" <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
On 08/22/2012 09:07 AM, Sam Ruby wrote: > On 08/02/2012 12:59 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote: >> >> */For these reasons I would ask that the chairs move issue 131 to >> HTML.next and save proposal >> /*http://www.w3.org/html/wg/wiki/ChangeProposals/CaretSelectionRevised*/ >> for >> review at that time. This will give more time for canvas, >> contenteditable, web-based IME support, and cross-cutting accessibility >> support to develop and mature. If the chairs agree to then I would >> support the chairs decision for HTML5 as a temporary one requiring >> greater view in the next version, otherwise I will need to formally >> object to the chairs decision. > > We previously vacated the original issue 131 decision, reopened the > issue, and allowed changes to be made: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Dec/0059.html > > Now Richard is asking that we effectively consider his proposal > withdrawn for the HTML5 time frame. Frank has also agreed to postpone > this to HTML.next: > > http://www.w3.org/2012/08/16-html-wg-minutes.html#item09 > > Given that no active proposals remain, the chairs are now asking if > there is consensus to roll back the hit testing proposal and to defer > the feature to HTML.next. If anybody would like to raise an objection > during this time, we will require them to accompany their objection with > a concrete and complete change proposal. > > If no objections are raised to this call by August 30th, 2012, we will > direct the editors to make the proposed change, and will only consider > subsequently reopening this issue based on new information and a > complete change proposal based on the spec's contents as it exists after > this change is applied. > > - Sam Ruby > > Note: while the process for HTML.next has not been determined, people > are welcome to publish proposals for what the spec should look like, and > should any Working Group member chose to do so, we will make provisions > to publish same on the W3C site (alongside any other proposals that may > be made) Hearing no objections, this call passes. Issue 131 will now be closed. - Sam Ruby
Received on Friday, 31 August 2012 12:01:07 UTC