W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2012

Re: ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Straw Poll for Objections

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:58:05 -0400
Message-ID: <4F83859D.8030709@intertwingly.net>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
CC: public-html@w3.org
On 04/09/2012 08:32 PM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
> Sam Ruby, Mon, 09 Apr 2012 19:51:59 -0400:
>> On 04/09/2012 06:54 PM, Edward O'Connor wrote:
>>> Paul Cotton wrote:
>>>
>>>> ISSUE-158: object-content-model - Straw Poll for Objections
>>>>
>>>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/158
>>>>
>>>> The poll is available here and it will run through Friday April 6:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I had planned to reply to Leif's updates to his ISSUE-158 CP within my
>>> poll response,[1] but I missed that the poll closed last week. I'm sorry
>>> to have missed the poll; my HTML WG time last week was taken up with
>>> work on ISSUE-194 and ISSUE-201. Despite its tardiness, I hope that the
>>> Chairs will accept the below comment as a response on the poll.
>>
>> In order to make certain that these comments weren't overlooked, I
>> extended the survey date briefly to enable Ted to make his comments
>> and then reset the closing date back:
>>
>> http://krijnhoetmer.nl/irc-logs/html-wg/20120410#l-20
>
> The only problem I have with this is that Ted's arguments came so late
> that I could not answer them. I sent a reply, just now. Perhaps the
> chairs will allow that too?

Agreed.  And Ted is welcome to respond to your response.  Given where we 
are in the schedule, the chairs can afford to wait until either this 
discussion either completes naturally, or fails to provide new information.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 10 April 2012 00:58:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:47 GMT