W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-177, was: ISSUE-177 ietf-id-wip: Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:56:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4E92189A.5050601@gmx.de>
To: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
CC: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG LIST <public-html@w3.org>
On 2011-10-09 23:23, Anne van Kesteren wrote:
> On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:59:10 +0200, Julian Reschke
> <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>> RATIONALE
>>
>> In addition to the simple fact described above, marking drafts as such
>> will help reviewers better understand that the referenced document is
>> work-in-progress, helping preventing things from progressing on the
>> Rec track while having a normative reference to a document that's not
>> suited as normative reference. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#sniff>.
>
> Given that it is cited as work in progress there how did it help for
> that document?

That's a good point. Apparently it did not. Maybe it will in other cases.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:57:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:28 UTC