W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2011

Re: Change Proposal for ISSUE-177, was: ISSUE-177 ietf-id-wip: Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Oct 2011 23:23:29 +0200
To: "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "HTML WG LIST" <public-html@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.v23sdflx64w2qv@cm-84.208.66.146.getinternet.no>
On Sun, 09 Oct 2011 15:59:10 +0200, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>  
wrote:
> RATIONALE
>
> In addition to the simple fact described above, marking drafts as such  
> will help reviewers better understand that the referenced document is  
> work-in-progress, helping preventing things from progressing on the Rec  
> track while having a normative reference to a document that's not suited  
> as normative reference. See <http://www.w3.org/TR/widgets/#sniff>.

Given that it is cited as work in progress there how did it help for that  
document?


-- 
Anne van Kesteren
http://annevankesteren.nl/
Received on Sunday, 9 October 2011 21:24:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:28 UTC