W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: ISSUE-124, Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-03-03: Issues, Decisions, Task Force Reports, and Other Business

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Mar 2011 10:40:15 -0800
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Message-id: <4FAB10E7-8381-43F9-811F-85A7C1BAFCBC@apple.com>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>

Oh, I failed to notice that rel=bookmark was explicitly mentioned in the issue. That's a different situation.  I'll have to confer with my fellow co-chairs about this.

 - Maciej

On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:31 AM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:

> 
> Yes, anything that's not covered in the issue can be raised as a separate bug.
> 
> - Maciej
> 
> On Mar 2, 2011, at 10:03 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> On 02.03.2011 18:39, Sam Ruby wrote:
>>> ...
>>> ...
>>> f) ISSUE-124: rel-limits, Straw Poll for Objections closed Feb 28
>>> http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10412
>>> ...
>> 
>> While following the bug link I realized that the CP for ISSUE-124 should have included the "bookmark" relation. I missed that.
>> 
>> I assume I can re-raise this later on as LC bug, right?
>> 
>> Best regards, Julian
>> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 2 March 2011 18:41:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:23 UTC