W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > March 2011

Re: ISSUE-124, Re: {agenda} HTML WG telecon 2011-03-03: Issues, Decisions, Task Force Reports, and Other Business

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Thu, 03 Mar 2011 17:33:04 -0500
Message-ID: <4D701720.8030807@intertwingly.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
CC: "public-html@w3.org" <public-html@w3.org>
On 03/02/2011 01:03 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> On 02.03.2011 18:39, Sam Ruby wrote:
>> ...
>  > ...
>> f) ISSUE-124: rel-limits, Straw Poll for Objections closed Feb 28
>> http://w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=10412
>> ...
>
> While following the bug link I realized that the CP for ISSUE-124 should
> have included the "bookmark" relation. I missed that.
>
> I assume I can re-raise this later on as LC bug, right?

We are comfortable treating bugs for which no change proposal was 
brought forward as "closed without prejudice".  Operationally that means 
that no new bugs need to be filed, but the issue will not be treated as 
OPEN until a change proposal is received.

If/when such a change proposal is received, would be less confusing to 
track it as a new issue which was split off of the previous one, as that 
one has already gone to survey.

And, yes, any such issue will be treated as one received during LC.

> Best regards, Julian

- Sam Ruby
Received on Thursday, 3 March 2011 22:33:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:23 UTC