- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2011 10:59:02 -0700
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>, Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Jun 24, 2011, at 10:01 AM, Aryeh Gregor wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 7:25 PM, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: >> What specific update do you have in mind? As far as I know, the content there is up to date. > > It still says "Editors will give an initial disposition to incoming > bugs", "When an Editor gives the initial Editor's response", "it may > be appropriate for someone other than the Editor of the relevant draft > to resolve the bug", etc. There's no mention of Editorial Assistants > -- it makes it sound like only the editor can give editor's responses. I see. In that case, I believe it is covered by <http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=13003>. I'd appreciate a comment in that bug as a reminder to address that specifyc aspect. > > (Incidentally, should I replace "EDITOR'S RESPONSE" in the boilerplate > with "EDITORIAL ASSISTANT'S RESPONSE", or leave it as-is? I was > changing it, but now I see "Editor's response" is a term that's > specifically defined in the Decision Policy, so I guess I should leave > it.) I think leaving it as-is is better. Editorial Assistants act on behalf of the Editor. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 24 June 2011 17:59:49 UTC