- From: Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis <bhawkeslewis@googlemail.com>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 22:08:08 +0100
- To: Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com>
- Cc: Canvas <public-canvas-api@w3.org>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>, Frank Olivier <Frank.Olivier@microsoft.com>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, David Singer <singer@apple.com>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Edward O'Connor" <hober0@gmail.com>
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 8:38 PM, Charles Pritchard <chuck@jumis.com> wrote: > There was some debate about remote access being a reasonable use case, as > well > as debate about whether the rendering of other non-web/legacy formats > qualified as a reasonable use case. If you're talking about me here (?), my argument was *not* that remote access is not a "reasonable use case". My position was: 1. Use cases can be desirable without being practical to solve. 2. Although the trend towards cloud-computing may make it increasingly irrelevant, remote system access remains a desirable use case to solve for now and could make a practical difference in terms of the employability of people with disabilities. 3. Accessibility for web-based remote system access is most practically approached using remote AT, just as it's currently approached with native remote system access. You did raise a remote application access use case, but I asked for real-world examples of this and none were forthcoming, so it's very hard to evaluate the use case or suggested approaches. > Is the support of legacy code an acceptable use case? > https://github.com/kripken/emscripten/wiki > > emscripten runs LLVM byte code, and -necessarily- uses Canvas for painting > output. If you're talking about a web application providing a sort of emulator, I think that situation is essentially the same as with remote system access: most practically approached by running AT inside the emulation. -- Benjamin Hawkes-Lewis
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2011 21:08:46 UTC