W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: ISSUE-151 (whatwg-references): Chairs Solicit Proposals

From: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 23:40:05 +0100
To: public-html@w3.org
Message-ID: <op.vpqek3g5sr6mfa@nog>
On Wed, 05 Jan 2011 19:55:00 +0100, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>  

> 'Remove WhatWG and html5.org references in status section of document'
> Per the decision policy, at this time the chairs would like to solicit
> volunteers to write Change Proposals.
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/151
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html#escalation
> If no Change Proposals are written by February 6th, 2011 this issue
> will be closed without prejudice.
> Issue status link:
> http://dev.w3.org/html5/status/issue-status.html#ISSUE-151


Edit at will. I'll revert at will.

Why are editorial and trivial issues like this, ISSUE-145 and ISSUE-139  
allowed to reach this stage of the decision process and waste the time of  
this WG? Why can't the chairs evaluate the issue and take a decision in  
simple cases? Even the wrong decision is better than going through the  
Process for ISSUEs that don't have any real-world impact.

Philip Jägenstedt
Core Developer
Opera Software
Received on Saturday, 22 January 2011 22:40:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:08 UTC