W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

RE: hgroup: a possible alternative

From: Dean Leigh <dean.leigh@deanleigh.co.uk>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 07:25:33 -0000
Message-ID: <1174F8ED82AF7048905B3241C81BF17BC16550@HEMV1AUKER.he.local>
To: "Leif Halvard Silli" <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: "HTML WG LIST" <public-html@w3.org>
From 
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11737


* Doesn't support the use case of multiple subheadings of different weights.
This seems like a very minor use case that could be addressed in the future if
it is significant.

This could be addressed with sh1-sh6

Regards,
Dean Leigh


>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Leif Halvard Silli [mailto:xn--mlform-iua@målform.no]
>>Sent: 12 January 2011 22:11
>>To: Dean Leigh
>>Cc: HTML WG LIST
>>Subject: RE: hgroup: a possible alternative
>>
>>Dean Leigh, Wed, 12 Jan 2011 20:15:37 -0000:
>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>> From: Leif Halvard Silli
>>>
>>>>>> I assume the next questions will be should we allow more than 1
>>>>>> <hx> within an <hgroup>?
>>>>>
>>>>> Doesn't fit with well with roles I proposed, to have more than hx.
>>>
>>> I agree - only 1 hx in <hgroup>
>>>
>>> Would you agree to allow multiple <sh> ?
>>
>>Bug 11737 [1] has taken that in from the very beginning: «Change content
>>model of <hgroup> to single <hx> + zero or more <sh>
>>(sub/suphead) elements».
>>
>>[1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=11737

>>--
>>leif halvard silli
Received on Thursday, 13 January 2011 07:26:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:18 GMT