W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Why hgroup?

From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2011 17:51:37 -0800
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=0fJzGuD-2_Okq2n29wmhaiD7w626WFfnzMh08@mail.gmail.com>
To: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>
Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Leif Halvard Silli
<xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no> wrote:
> Tab Atkins Jr., Mon, 10 Jan 2011 12:58:04 -0800:
>> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 2:51 AM, Leif Halvard Silli wrote:
>>> Anne van Kesteren, Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:14:07 +0100:
>>>> On Thu, 06 Jan 2011 19:04:11 +0100, Steve Faulkner  wrote:
>>>>> So sibling selectors are not good enough for CSS/JavaScript & shared
>>>>> classes for CSS ?
>
>>> I am still analysing <hgroup>. But nevertheless, your analysis *here*
>>> seems wrong: <dl> is actually the HTML4 elements that resembles
>>> <hgroup> the most:
>
>> You are completely misunderstanding the distinction Anne is trying to
>> make.
>
> I don't think I did.

I think you did.  We are now at an impasse.

~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 11 January 2011 01:52:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:18 GMT