W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > January 2011

Re: Media TextFormats Accessibility Comparison Summary Released

From: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
Date: Mon, 3 Jan 2011 17:20:32 +0200
Cc: HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F00D35F6-94EA-40D3-B2BD-F87F3AC6D8A7@iki.fi>
To: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Dec 17, 2010, at 20:15, Janina Sajka wrote:

> The comparison summary document is available at:
> 
> http://www.w3.org/WAI/PF/HTML/wiki/TextFormat_Comparison_Overview

I obverse that the comparison fails to mention the use of a formatting model (XSL-FO) that isn't already implemented by browser engines as an "issue" for TTML (and fails to mention the use of the CSS formatting model as a strength of WebSRT/WebVTT). This is a rather central omission in the comparison.

-- 
Henri Sivonen
hsivonen@iki.fi
http://hsivonen.iki.fi/
Received on Monday, 3 January 2011 15:21:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:21 UTC