W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: request to re-open issue 133 due to submission of a change prposal.

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 14:26:41 -0800
Cc: HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
Message-Id: <7BCCE6BF-8703-4327-A7BB-B110D7CDFE2D@gbiv.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
On Feb 1, 2011, at 1:57 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:

> On 02/01/2011 04:28 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>> Can the chairs please explain why it has not been re-opened as a pre
>> last call issue when it was filed prior to the cutoff and closed without
>> prejudice due to lack of change proposal.
> 
> All escalations after Jan 22, 2011 will be treated as a Last Call comment:
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html

Er, last call is defined by consensus of the working group, not the chairs.
In any case, if it was closed without prejudice then reopening it is not
an escalation (descent in priority would be a prejudice).

....Roy
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:27:10 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:22 UTC