W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > February 2011

Re: request to re-open issue 133 due to submission of a change prposal.

From: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2011 22:29:03 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTin5aooxuBP_TJADCupQFFUnPfMGX41BeR=aKi9B@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>, "E.J. Zufelt" <everett@zufelt.ca>, HTML Accessibility Task Force <public-html-a11y@w3.org>, HTMLWG WG <public-html@w3.org>
hi sam,

from the same email:

"That date is October 1. Any bug in the system by that date (even if
reopened, resolved, or escalated) will be resolved before Last Call, and we
will fully process any that are escalated to issues."

where does it say that issues closed then reopened will not be considered
for last call?


regards
stevef


On 1 February 2011 22:18, Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:

> hi sam,
>
> what you cited says
>
>
> - Jan 22, 2010 - cutoff for escalating bugs for pre-LC consideration - all issues in tracker, calls for proposal issued by this date
> Consequences of missing this date: any further escalations will be treated as a Last Call comment.
>
>
> this was not an escalation, it was already a bug that had been escalated,
> it was already an issue, a call for proposals had already been issued.
>
> the timeline says:
>
>
> Feb 23, 2011 - every issue has at least one Change Proposal
> Consequences of missing this date: issues will be closed without prejudice and marked POSTPONED; can be reconsidered during LC or for a later version of HTML.
>
> the issue has one change proposal.
>
> it would be good if the chairs followed their own rules.
>
> regards
> Stevef
>
> On 1 February 2011 21:57, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
>
>> On 02/01/2011 04:28 PM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>>
>>> Can the chairs please explain why it has not been re-opened as a pre
>>> last call issue when it was filed prior to the cutoff and closed without
>>> prejudice due to lack of change proposal.
>>>
>>
>> All escalations after Jan 22, 2011 will be treated as a Last Call comment:
>>
>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2010Sep/0074.html
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>
>
>
> --
> with regards
>
> Steve Faulkner
> Technical Director - TPG
>
> www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
> www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
> HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
> dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
> Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
>
>
>


-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG

www.paciellogroup.com | www.HTML5accessibility.com |
www.twitter.com/stevefaulkner
HTML5: Techniques for providing useful text alternatives -
dev.w3.org/html5/alt-techniques/
Web Accessibility Toolbar - www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 1 February 2011 22:33:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:21 GMT