- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:18:33 -0500
- To: "Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com" <mtanalin@yandex.ru>
- CC: Tantek Çelik <tantek@cs.stanford.edu>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 12/08/2011 10:17 AM, Marat Tanalin | tanalin.com wrote: > > With the removal of the "drop pubdate" portion, and the addition of > space character as allowed alternative for "T" as date/time > separator, your proposal [2] seems to be fine for me in its current > form. While the chairs do plan to give people more time to prepare proposals and counter proposals, based on the feedback we heard in TPAC and the (as of now) lack of pushback on the existing Change Proposal for issue 183, the chairs have decided to vacate *JUST* the <time> portion of the revert request[1] for change r6783. The portion of the revert request which required the restoring of the pubdate attribute and the removal of the <data> element parts still stand. Furthermore, we see no need to separate out a second issue[2] for the <time> element at this time. Nor do we see a need for the existing change proposal for an enhanced time element to be developed further until or unless there are objections. We further will state that we do not intend to honor any revert requests in the specific areas covered by the existing change proposal for the <time> element. > Thanks. - Sam Ruby [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0011.html [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Nov/0186.html
Received on Friday, 9 December 2011 12:19:03 UTC