W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Bug 11239

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 18:10:34 -0400
Message-ID: <4DBB375A.9090102@intertwingly.net>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
On 04/29/2011 05:20 PM, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> Steve, are your concerns addressed by the latest patch as well?

Just for clarity: Rich did not say that all of his concerns were 
addressed; he merely said that this part of the patch is acceptable and 
that he would review the entire patch.

> Regards,
> Maciej

- Sam Ruby

> On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:
>
>> Yes.
>>
>>
>> Rich Schwerdtfeger
>> CTO Accessibility Software Group
>>
>> <graycol.gif>Sam Ruby ---04/29/2011 03:28:17 PM---On 04/29/2011 04:04
>> PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >
>>
>> From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net <mailto:rubys@intertwingly.net>>
>> To: public-html@w3.org <mailto:public-html@w3.org>
>> Cc: Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
>> Date: 04/29/2011 03:28 PM
>> Subject: Re: Bug 11239
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>> On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> >
>> > I've tried to add a note to this effect.
>> >
>> > New patch on the bug:
>> >
>> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=981
>>
>> Specifically:
>>
>> > + On platforms where the user agent cannot determine the
>> > + blink period and cannot provide a default blink period, the
>> > + attribute should return &minus;1.
>>
>> Rich, is this acceptable? Can you review the proposed patch and
>> identify any other issues that that you might have with this patch?
>>
>> - Sam Ruby
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 22:11:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:28 GMT