W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: Bug 11239

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 14:20:07 -0700
Cc: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "public-html@w3.org WG" <public-html@w3.org>, Richard Schwerdtfeger <schwer@us.ibm.com>
Message-id: <DC1343E3-3714-49EC-AC61-32689EADA2EF@apple.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>

Steve, are your concerns addressed by the latest patch as well?

Regards,
Maciej

On Apr 29, 2011, at 1:34 PM, Richard Schwerdtfeger wrote:

> Yes.
> 
> 
> Rich Schwerdtfeger
> CTO Accessibility Software Group
> 
> <graycol.gif>Sam Ruby ---04/29/2011 03:28:17 PM---On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: >
> 
> From:	Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
> To:	public-html@w3.org
> Cc:	Richard Schwerdtfeger/Austin/IBM@IBMUS
> Date:	04/29/2011 03:28 PM
> Subject:	Re: Bug 11239
> 
> 
> 
> On 04/29/2011 04:04 PM, Ian Hickson wrote:
> >
> > I've tried to add a note to this effect.
> >
> > New patch on the bug:
> >
> > http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=981
> 
> Specifically:
> 
> > + On platforms where the user agent cannot determine the
> > + blink period and cannot provide a default blink period, the
> > + attribute should return &minus;1.
> 
> Rich, is this acceptable? Can you review the proposed patch and 
> identify any other issues that that you might have with this patch?
> 
> - Sam Ruby
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Friday, 29 April 2011 21:20:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:28 GMT