On 13 April 2011 03:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: >> Having said that, I don't personally believe it's desirable to specify >> and/or restrict the naming of the potential name-value fields, better >> to provide a general-purpose slot and "let the market decide". > > > Are you motivated for this request by the same functionality that Web > pages expose through <meta> tags as name-value pairs? That would make sense - keeping the shape of the data reasonably consistent. Personally I'm a big fan of RDF and reusable data, but in this particular case I reckon the priority is bringing the metadata out of the black box of media objects and making it available in the easiest-to-use form. Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.nameReceived on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 09:27:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:28 GMT