- From: Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2011 11:26:50 +0200
- To: Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com>
- Cc: Eric Carlson <eric.carlson@apple.com>, "public-html@w3.org (public-html@w3.org)" <public-html@w3.org>
On 13 April 2011 03:50, Silvia Pfeiffer <silviapfeiffer1@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 13, 2011 at 8:36 AM, Danny Ayers <danny.ayers@gmail.com> wrote: >> Having said that, I don't personally believe it's desirable to specify >> and/or restrict the naming of the potential name-value fields, better >> to provide a general-purpose slot and "let the market decide". > > > Are you motivated for this request by the same functionality that Web > pages expose through <meta> tags as name-value pairs? That would make sense - keeping the shape of the data reasonably consistent. Personally I'm a big fan of RDF and reusable data, but in this particular case I reckon the priority is bringing the metadata out of the black box of media objects and making it available in the easiest-to-use form. Cheers, Danny. -- http://danny.ayers.name
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2011 09:27:22 UTC