For those who would like to review the diff, it can be downloaded from here: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/attachment.cgi?id=976&action=edit On Apr 11, 2011, at 8:15 PM, Ian Hickson wrote: > On Mon, 11 Apr 2011, Sam Ruby wrote: >> >> Note that Maciej didn't specify who needs to provide the full spec text >> or diff. Last time Steve turned the request around in 21 hours, 54 >> minutes, and 12 seconds. Anybody care to set a new record? :-) > > I attached a diff to the bug around the same time I did the revert. As far > as I know it accurately and completely represents the decision, including > the issue that was raised earlier which I had previously "corrected" due > to my not realising that the decision could be taken literally on that > particular matter (which in retrospect was quite foolish of me). > > I wasn't sure what "posted to the WG" meant in Maciej's e-mail, so I > assumed attaching the diff to the bug was enough. Hopefully this e-mail > closes the loop on that. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.' >Received on Tuesday, 12 April 2011 03:25:49 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:27 GMT