- From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 01:16:50 +0000
- To: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- CC: HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 04/04/11 16:57, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> As mentioned every time this comes up, the second opinion >> regarding requirement (C) has already been rejected by the >> W3C members and is not intended to be satisfied by the PSIG >> proposals. > > That's fine; we're just saying that we don't consider the proposals > acceptable as a result. Further to this: we at Mozilla realize that objecting to existing proposals is not enough, and it would be good to make a positive counter-proposal. This week has been a (very busy) Mozilla meeting, and I am currently about to get on a plane (or, depending on the availability of WiFi at SFO airport, may just have got off one). However, I hope to propose something next week. Gerv
Received on Saturday, 9 April 2011 01:28:53 UTC