W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > April 2011

Re: PUT and DELETE methods in 200 code

From: mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2011 01:05:46 -0400
Message-ID: <BANLkTi=KgAMo1JE-qAZi++ogmwxSXzgDTg@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-html@w3.org
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Julian:

Can you post one or more typical HTTP request/response examples of how
PUT/DELETE interactions work for WebDAV servers today? This would help
me better understand what is/is-not possible w/ HTML FORMS that
support PUT/DELETE.

mca
http://amundsen.com/blog/
http://twitter.com@mamund
http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me


#RESTFest 2010
http://rest-fest.googlecode.com




On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 00:41, mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com> wrote:
> All:
>
> I've updated/reformatted the PUT/DELETE with HTML FORMS document[1]
> with the following:
> - Added "integrate w/ existing servers..." to the Goals section.
> - Added "Binary Transfers" to the Scenarios section.
> - Added Julian Reschke's query regarding exsting browsers handling
> 201/202/204 response to the Handling Responses section.
> - Added "Optional Added FORM Content Types", "Optional Support for
> Prefer Header", and "Support for Atom-Style PUT/DELETE" to the "Other
> Considerations" section.
>
> I think this reflects the key feedback from the last couple days.
>
> I've not had time to doing any research/testing on Julian's query
> regarding current browsers' handling of 201/202/204 responses. I
> figure browser folks can chime in here, eh?
>
> NOTE: I've cross-posted this to:
> - ietf-http-wg
> - public-html
> - public-html-comments
>
> If this is overkill, let me know.
>
> [1]http://amundsen.com/examples/put-delete-forms/
>
> mca
> http://amundsen.com/blog/
> http://twitter.com@mamund
> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>
>
> #RESTFest 2010
> http://rest-fest.googlecode.com
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 17:48, mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I've posted a document[1] that shows one way in which HTML FORMS can
>> support PUT/DELETE w/o the need for plug-ins or scripting. It's a
>> quick draft but I think it covers the basics.
>>
>> If this is not in the desired format let me know.
>>
>>
>> [1] http://amundsen.com/examples/put-delete-forms/
>>
>> mca
>> http://amundsen.com/blog/
>> http://twitter.com@mamund
>> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>>
>>
>> #RESTFest 2010
>> http://rest-fest.googlecode.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 14:26, mike amundsen <mamund@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>> <snip>
>>>> Personally I'd like to see a concrete proposal how PUT and DELETE will work
>>>> (examples with HTML and HTTP interaction). Right now it's totally not clear
>>>> to me.
>>>>
>>>>> And *where* shod this activity happen?
>>>>> - here
>>> </snip>
>>>
>>> Makes sense to me; I'll work up a few examples of HTTP/HTML this
>>> evening and post a link. If/when others do the same we can use them
>>> all as references in any discussion.
>>>
>>> mca
>>> http://amundsen.com/blog/
>>> http://twitter.com@mamund
>>> http://mamund.com/foaf.rdf#me
>>>
>>>
>>> #RESTFest 2010
>>> http://rest-fest.googlecode.com
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 14:14, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>>> On 01.04.2011 15:41, mike amundsen wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I see the bug has been re-opened.
>>>>>
>>>>> I see there has been some discussion on public-html-comments regarding
>>>>> PUT/DELETE[1].
>>>>> I also note at least one suggestion in that thread was to discuss this
>>>>> on the whatwg list[2].
>>>>>
>>>>> What is the preferred way to proceed here?
>>>>> - List concerns/reservations and deal with them as they come up?
>>>>> - Draw up a straw man proposal (is there a standard format for this)?
>>>>> - Some other process?
>>>>
>>>> Personally I'd like to see a concrete proposal how PUT and DELETE will work
>>>> (examples with HTML and HTTP interaction). Right now it's totally not clear
>>>> to me.
>>>>
>>>>> And *where* shod this activity happen?
>>>>> - here
>>>>
>>>> Here should be fine.
>>>>
>>>>> ...
>>>>
>>>> Best regards, Julian
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Received on Monday, 4 April 2011 05:06:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:27 GMT