W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Bug mail (Was: [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 17:13:30 -0400
Message-ID: <4C8E93FA.6070407@intertwingly.net>
To: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 09/13/2010 04:53 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net>  wrote:
>> On 09/13/2010 04:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've seen a lot of asdflkasd;jads bugs as a result of the bug form.  If
>>>>> people are complaining now...
>>>
>>> Do you have alternative proposals?
>>
>> To be clear, I am happy with the current system.
>
> Ok. (Though I'm wondering if that is with your chair hat on, or with
> your WG member hat on?)

Fair question.

With my WG hat on, I am not concerned about the volume, though I can see 
that people could differ.

With my co-chair hat on (though without having first checked with my 
co-chairs), I think that it is vital that emails are sent to the list 
for every non-editorial bug, and that people can't opt out(*).

If it improves things to include editorial bugs (and spam), I am OK with 
that.  Including the body is also an excellent idea.

> / Jonas

(*) Of course, people can apply client filters.  My goal is only to 
eliminate excuses.  My observation is that most of the work of the 
working group happens in bugzilla, which I will argue is a very good 
thing.  I want to allow everybody an opportunity to participate.  The 
alternative is to force everybody back onto the list, and I don't think 
anybody would be in favor of that.
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 21:14:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC