- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:39:24 -0400
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- CC: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 09/13/2010 04:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote: >> I've seen a lot of asdflkasd;jads bugs as a result of the bug form. If >> > people are complaining now... > Do you have alternative proposals? To be clear, I am happy with the current system. On 09/13/2010 04:09 PM, James Graham wrote: > >> I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the >> subject of every non-editorial bug. Ultimately, I expect the change >> control as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only >> changes made to the document are in response to bugs reported. > > I don't think you can force that on people. Perhaps I was too diplomatic :-) My true goal is to eliminate any excuse. > I suggest trying to make the average information density way, way, > higher with e.g. each bug getting exactly one mail to the the list with > the full description (not just the title) +1 - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 20:40:06 UTC