W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Bug mail (Was: [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element)

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 16:39:24 -0400
Message-ID: <4C8E8BFC.2060701@intertwingly.net>
To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
CC: Philip J├Ągenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On 09/13/2010 04:11 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>> I've seen a lot of asdflkasd;jads bugs as a result of the bug form.  If
>> > people are complaining now...
> Do you have alternative proposals?

To be clear, I am happy with the current system.

On 09/13/2010 04:09 PM, James Graham wrote:
>
>> I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the
>> subject of every non-editorial bug. Ultimately, I expect the change
>> control as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only
>> changes made to the document are in response to bugs reported.
>
> I don't think you can force that on people.

Perhaps I was too diplomatic :-)

My true goal is to eliminate any excuse.

> I suggest trying to make the average information density way, way,
> higher with e.g. each bug getting exactly one mail to the the list with
> the full description (not just the title)

+1

- Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 20:40:06 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC