W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: Bug mail (Was: [Bug 10479] add role=radiogroup to details element)

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2010 13:11:44 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTinP3EPsoL-6m3r430XJ2PrNzU_18OeP7oCc0oqC@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Philip Jägenstedt <philipj@opera.com>, public-html@w3.org
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:
> On 09/13/2010 03:45 PM, Jonas Sicking wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 12:06 PM, Sam Ruby<rubys@intertwingly.net>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On 09/13/2010 03:07 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 08:24:39 +0200, Jonas Sicking<jonas@sicking.cc>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:49 PM, Henri Sivonen<hsivonen@iki.fi>
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Would it be possible for the accessibility task force to track bugs
>>>>>>> using the status whiteboard instead of using a keyword.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Or, better yet, continue to use keywords but make the email path not
>>>>>> spam public-html for keyword changes. Or for any bug modifications
>>>>>> after the bug creation for that matter.
>>>>>
>>>>> I always liked the fact that the group got email when the NE keyword
>>>>> was added.
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I want every member of this list to be aware of -- at a minimum -- the
>>> subject of every non-editorial bug.  Ultimately, I expect the change
>>> control
>>> as we move to LC and beyond to be that at some point the only changes
>>> made
>>> to the document are in response to bugs reported.
>>
>> Note that the NE keyword hasn't been 100% successful in this task. I
>> believe a lot of the filed bugs are currently lacking it.
>
> While anything involving humans is bound to have bugs, Mike has been
> dilligent so that I don't think that there is any systematic problems here.
>
>> Though I
>> can't really blame people because sometimes it's hard to tell if an
>> issue just needs to be clarified, or if behavior needs to be changed.
>> I think it would be much more effective to have the initial bugmail to
>> to the list whenever a bug is filed.
>
> I've seen a lot of asdflkasd;jads bugs as a result of the bug form.  If
> people are complaining now...

Do you have alternative proposals?

One solution might be to have the bug form give bugs a separate QA
contact, and then manually migrate the ones that aren't spam.

/ Jonas
Received on Monday, 13 September 2010 20:12:37 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:19 UTC