W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work?

From: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2010 06:18:07 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTikqBDyoF=xjrsrwGPTn51y=Lxe3+NKTV32MRSHk@mail.gmail.com>
To: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Hi Sam,

OK by me.



On 7 September 2010 01:40, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On 08/26/2010 05:10 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
>
>> OK,  have changed the short and long names, have added the sections to
>> display the issue status.
>>
> >
>
>> Once this shows up in the spec and the incorrect "last call for
>> comments" status is removed or replaced with something that accurately
>> reflects the status, then I will have no objection to closing issue 116
>> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116
>>
>
> Steve: can you take a quick peek to see if everything has been resolved to
> your satisfaction?  If so, I will issue a call for consensus to close 116 by
> amicable resolution.
>
> - Sam Ruby
>



-- 
with regards

Steve Faulkner
Technical Director - TPG Europe
Director - Web Accessibility Tools Consortium

www.paciellogroup.com | www.wat-c.org
Web Accessibility Toolbar -
http://www.paciellogroup.com/resources/wat-ie-about.html
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 05:18:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:14 GMT