W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > September 2010

Re: ISSUE-116: Would a separate document work?

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2010 20:40:04 -0400
Message-ID: <4C8589E4.3090707@intertwingly.net>
To: Steven Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 08/26/2010 05:10 AM, Steven Faulkner wrote:
> OK,  have changed the short and long names, have added the sections to
> display the issue status.
> Once this shows up in the spec and the incorrect "last call for
> comments" status is removed or replaced with something that accurately
> reflects the status, then I will have no objection to closing issue 116
> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/116

Steve: can you take a quick peek to see if everything has been resolved 
to your satisfaction?  If so, I will issue a call for consensus to close 
116 by amicable resolution.

- Sam Ruby
Received on Tuesday, 7 September 2010 00:40:39 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 29 October 2015 10:16:04 UTC