- From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
- Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:39:51 +0200
- To: "Maciej Stachowiak" <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: "Ian Hickson" <ian@hixie.ch>, "Sam Ruby" <rubys@intertwingly.net>, "HTML WG" <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:31:06 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> wrote: > > On Oct 28, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Simon Pieters wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 09:28:01 +0200, Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Anyway, now that it has been brought up - what do you think of the >>> warning box in the recently published Navigation Timing Working Draft: >>> <http://www.w3.org/TR/2010/WD-navigation-timing-20101026/>? >>> >>> How would others in the WG feel about a similar warning box in the >>> status section of HTML WG drafts? >> >> I don't care what the text is, but I think the message should be >> visible anywhere you end up in the spec -- people often search for a >> specific section of the spec and thus never see the SotD. > > My personal preference would be not to have a constantly visible message > (since that gets distracting), but rather something that is at least > partly visible in the first screenful of content on a reasonable-size > screen. That seems to be the case for the Navigation Timing warning box, > but the HTML5 draft at least has much lengthier front matter. > > I suspect removing all but one of the previous version links and putting > the warning higher up in the SotD would do the trick. > > Note: these are just personal preferences and I am not inclined to be > pushy about them if the WG prefers otherwise. Having it higher up in the SotD doesn't solve the issue I described. I meant that people search through a search engine and end up in a specific section in the multipage version, and thus never see the SotD. -- Simon Pieters Opera Software
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:40:35 UTC