W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Request to Revert revision 1.4525

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 10:11:14 +0200
Message-ID: <4CC93022.5030607@gmx.de>
To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
CC: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On 28.10.2010 10:00, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
>
> On Oct 28, 2010, at 12:45 AM, Steve Faulkner wrote:
>
>> Hi Maciej,
>> I think that warning is fine, except that it is visually emphasised,
>> but not in the mark-up. suggest the most robust way to empahsise this
>> information is to provide a heading for it.
>> Also the example points to a draft of the same spec, currently the
>> HTML5 spec does not, I suggest that it be a stipulated the link point
>> to a draft version of the spec , preferably in W3C space, not to a
>> spec that is HTML5 + other stuff.
>
> I believe the warning being proposed here is that the W3C HTML5 Working
> Draft would have a warning box linking to the W3C HTML5 Editor's Draft,
> in much the same way as is done in the Navigation Timing WD.

+1 (both to the proposal + Steve's comment).

> That's as opposed to the current warning in the W3C HTML5 Editor's Draft
> that links to the WHATWG draft. I believe the Chairs stand by our
> request to remove that warning, and the greying out of all text in the
> draft.

I recommend that somebody with CVS access applies this; I don't think we 
need the spec editor to do it.

Can we add this as agenda item in the telco? It would be great to 
understand what the actual problem is that this was supposed to fix.

Best regards, Julian
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:12:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Monday, 29 September 2014 09:39:20 UTC