W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: Request to Revert revision 1.4525

From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2010 01:16:50 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTikD-dcUuNEp5nhbbOqp4dR8COqh3HygxFSeCw+T@mail.gmail.com>
To: Steve Faulkner <faulkner.steve@gmail.com>
Cc: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 12:45 AM, Steve Faulkner
<faulkner.steve@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Maciej,
>
> I think that warning is fine, except that it is visually emphasised, but not
> in the mark-up. suggest the most robust way to empahsise this information is
> to provide a heading for it.

Isn't it more semantically correct to use the <em> element? If not, is
the <em> element failing to fulfill its intended purpose and should be
removed?

/ Jonas
Received on Thursday, 28 October 2010 08:17:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:16 GMT