W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-html@w3.org > October 2010

Re: question about canvas survey and issue-131

From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:10:44 -0400
Message-ID: <4CBEEA54.8050909@intertwingly.net>
To: Cynthia Shelly <cyns@microsoft.com>
CC: HTML WG Public List <public-html@w3.org>
On 10/14/2010 03:16 PM, Sam Ruby wrote:
> On 10/14/2010 03:05 PM, Cynthia Shelly wrote:
>> I have a question for the chairs about the survey on Issues 74 and 105
>> with respect to issue 131.
>>
>> As I understand the issues, question #4 on the survey [1], “Objections
>> to adding advisory text explaining how to use the focus rect API for
>> efficient caret position notification, and change nothing else?” is a
>> counter-proposal to the proposal covered in 131 [2] to add a caret API
>> and focus rectangle handling. It seems odd to me to survey question 4
>> now, while deferring the proposal it counters. Perhaps we should include
>> question 4 in issue 131 and remove it from the current survey?
>
> Anybody object to me taking question 4 off of the survey and
> incorporating it into the resolution of issue 131?

Hearing no objections, we will remove question 4 from consideration, and 
incorporate this question into the resolution of issue-131.

>> Thanks,
>>
>> Cynthia
>>
>> [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/40318/issues-74-and-105-objection-poll/
>> [2] http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/131
>
> - Sam Ruby

- Sam Ruby
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 13:11:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 9 May 2012 00:17:16 GMT